Media: the Grauniad strikes again
Saturday 19 January 2013
The Grauniad strikes again. What was that Leveson said about mainstream journalists having "a powerful reputation for accuracy"?
COMMENT THREAD Richard North 19/01/2013 |
EU politics: in "Europe" and ruled by Norway
Saturday 19 January 2013
When he says that we need to be members of the EU to gain access to the Single Market, Mr Cameron should be aware that this is what he is getting for our money (illustrated above). "Trade policy", says the EU Commission, "is an exclusive power of the EU – so only the EU, and not individual member states, can legislate on trade matters and conclude international trade agreements".
What Mr Cameron should also be aware of is that this has wide-ranging practical implications, the like of which have barely been spelled out in any public forum. But despite that, he still argues that we must stay in the EU, because "we need a say in the rules of that market". Take for instance, our car industry which last year produced 1.58 million cars, exporting a record amount. Much of that success, we are told, is the result of the Single Market, and if we left the EU, much of the car industry would move out of Britain – presumably because Britain no longer would have a say in making the rules. But who actually makes the rule for the car industry? Does Mr Cameron actually know? Does he realise that they are no longer made by the EU? When we actually look at where they do come from, we find our old friend UNECE looming large. Its Transport Division, based in Geneva, provides secretariat services to the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), and has been doing so for more than 50 years. By its own account, the World Forum incorporates into its regulatory framework the technological innovations of vehicles relating safety and environment impact. WP 29 was established on June 1952 as "Working party of experts on technical requirement of vehicles". The current name was adopted in 2000. As to a little bit of detail, the core of the Forum's work is based around the "1958 Agreement", known formally as "Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions". This was augmented by a further Agreement in 1998. As helpfully explained here, these form a legal framework wherein participating countries (contracting parties) agree a common set of technical prescriptions and protocols for type approval of vehicles and components. The UNECE instruments, produced under the Agreements, are classic "diqules". As quasi-legislation, they have no mandatory effect until converted into laws by the territorial bodies signatory to the agreements (contracting parties). Despite that, they used to be called "UNECE Regulations" or, less formally, "ECE Regulations". Since many non-European countries are now contracting parties to the Agreements, the regulations are now officially entitled "UN Regulations". Through this, each contracting party's type approvals are recognised by all other contracting parties. There are currently 57 signatories to the Agreements, including non-EU countries such as Norway and the major vehicle manufacturing countries of Japan and South Korea. And the EU is also a part, having acceded via Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 and Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000. And now for the interesting bits. When it comes dealing with the World Forum, we see thisinteresting report. The European Commission on behalf of EU Member States, it says, seeks "continuously increase their involvement in the Geneva technical legislative process, in particular by working within WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies in order to ensure harmonisation between UNECE Regulations and EU legislation". As a result, we thus discover that the EU's own major regulations on the general safety of motor vehicles have been replaced with UN Regulations. They aren't EU regulations any more. They might have an EU label on them by the time they get to us, but they're made in Geneva, not Brussels. Dealing with UNECE, of course, is part of trade policy – part of the Single Market, so the EU takes change. Graciously, the EU Commission allows Member States take part in the preparatory work of the UNECE working parties. If it becomes obvious at this stage, the kindly EU tells us, that further discussions between experts are necessary, an informal working group may be set up within a working party with a view to making progress in the development of the Regulations. This may occur where there is a rapid development of complex new technologies. And we can even take part in these informal groups. However, when it comes finally to agreeing the standards proposed by UNECE, the Member States have to take the back seat. The European Commission, it says firmly, "exercises the right to vote in WP.29 on behalf of the EU and its 27 Member States". Thus, despite the UK having major vehicle manufacturing interests, producing its 1.58 million cars in 2012, we have no direct vote on vehicle standards. We do not have a seat at the table. Just in case you might ask, yes Norway – as a full member of UNECE - takes part in the World Forum. As an independent nation, it represents itself in the committees and votes on its own behalf. Despite having no indigenous manufacturing industry, it takes an active part in the proceedings. What a fascinating contrast that makes. The UK, as a member of the EU, with its seat at the EU table, isn't allowed to vote on technical standards for motor vehicles, where the decisions are actually made – in Geneva. We get a seat in Brussels, but no seat in Geneva where it really matters. On the other hand, Norway, which isn't a member of the EU, but is a member of the Single Market through the EEA, does get a vote in Geneva. Even though it doesn't have a car industry, it has more say in deciding on the standards to which our cars will be built than we do. That, no doubt, is why Mr Cameron wants us to stay in the European Union. COMMENT THREAD Richard North 19/01/2013 |
EU politics: that speech
Saturday 19 January 2013
The only trouble is that de Gaulle actually delivered his rejection in a speech on 14 January 1963, the famous put-down: Britain was "insular, maritime …", etc, adding that Britain was "profoundly different from the continental states". For sure, the actual veto was not formally cast until later, in a meeting of the Six which began in Brussels on 28 January 1963. We have it in The Great Deception that the actual veto was cast on that day, and Heath, Britain's chief negotiator, was apprised of de Gaulle's action at the time. However, the meeting continued with last-ditch attempts led by Germany to change de Gaulle's mind, with the talks finally and irrevocably breaking down the following morning, 29 January. It was then that the public announcement was made and the collapse of the talks was reported, with themain report coming on the 30 January. This may be a small detail, but it all points to a lack of depth in a subject where detail is everything. But as regards the detail, 14 January would have been a better date for the speech, and that has been and gone. Nevertheless, one cannot disagree with the generality of Moore's conclusion that: "The European Union is becoming an economic, political, cultural and demographic backwater – a tourist destination, not a great power". Sadly though – in talking about tourist destinations - he is confusing Europe and the European Union, the latter being a system of government and not a physical place. What Moore doesn't spell out, and probably doesn't know, is how far power has moved away from the EU, to become centred on international bodies on a global level, but that is detail, and the likes of Moore don't do detail. And on a matter of detail, the Financial Times is reporting that Mr Cameron intends to give his long-awaited Europe speech on Monday, after months of delay and a last-minute cancellation, although – says the paper - it may yet be derailed again by the Algerian hostage situation. The prime minister, we are told, knows that the long build-up and pre-briefing are at risk of turning the event itself into an anticlimax. But the final decision on when to deliver it is unlikely to be taken until Sunday. That, we can take with a pinch of salt but, even if it is Monday, that will give him time to read the Booker column tomorrow (or even tonight). He should study it carefully, and re-write his speech. COMMENT THREAD Richard North 19/01/2013 |
EU regulation: licensed integration
Saturday 19 January 2013
According to the report, people with licences for life must trade them in for a new licence by 2033. Belgium, France and Cyprus are still issuing paper licences at this time and will not be compliant with the directive by tomorrow, the Commission said. France said it will be compliant within six months, but it is not known when Belgium will be compliant. But the main event is that, by this means, drivers are forced to apply for a document with the ring of stars emblazoned on it. The excuse for this, according to Siim Kallas, EU commissioner for transport, is that: "Traffic police across Europe are currently expected to recognise more than 100 different types of paper and plastic driving licence". Of course, even if there was an excuse for a "little Europe" license, there is no need for the ring of stars. Strangely, there is an EEA version (see page 253), which Norway uses. And although it is standard EU format, so that the poor little europlods can recognise it, it doesn't have the dreaded EU symbol. All that goes to prove what we already know – that the EU is trying to impose a cultural identity on us. And it also provides another very good reason why we should decouple from the EU. Standardisation – to an extent – we don't mind. But we can do without the baggage. COMMENT THREAD Richard North 19/01/2013 |
Saturday 19 January 2013
Posted by Britannia Radio at 21:38
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Posted by Britannia Radio at 21:31
Leicester drama shows that multiculturalism is a mess
#edl
#riversofblood
19012013
First the Leicester media reported that a 40 strong gang of thugs had attacked a Muslim restaurant. People reading it would naturally assume it was white racists.
Turns out it was Sikhs who were angry at a sex attack on a Sikh girl by Muslims.
Police and faith leaders met last night to find ways of easing tensions after the ransacking of a Muslim-owned restaurant by a 40-strong Sikh mob.
The city’s top officers sat with representatives from Leicester Council of Faiths to discuss the apparently orchestrated attack by a vigilante gang at the Moghul Durbar restaurant, in East Park Road, Spinney Hills, on Monday night.
Police said they were worried the incident – which they said was fuelled by false rumours – would lead to revenge attacks and escalate as both groups sought retaliation.
City police commander Chief Superintendent Rob Nixon said Monday’s attack was sparked by misinformation regarding the rape of a teenage Sikh girl.
“We are aware of a number of rumours and misinformation which is circulating within the communities in Leicester,” he told the Mercury.
“Firstly, a rumour that a Sikh girl has been raped and Leicestershire Police has done nothing despite being in possession of video evidence of that rape. This is not true.
“Reports that a Sikh girl has been snatched from outside a gurdwara in Leicester are also false.
“As part of a separate investigation, officers are speaking with a girl and her family in relation to concerns her family have raised for her welfare.
We are unable to comment further on this investigation.
“Leicestershire Police urges members of the community not to listen to rumour or speculate about the incident.”
Workers and diners were injured when a frenzied mob piled into the restaurant on Monday evening, smashing doors and windows.
Three men were still in hospital last night, in a stable condition.
Police met members of the Sikh and Muslim communities at Mansfield House police station, in the city centre, yesterday evening, to discuss ways to relieve the tension within the Spinney Hills community.
Assistant city mayor Manjula Sood, who is chairman of Leicester Council of Faiths, was at the meeting.
She said: “Both the Sikh and Muslim communities are anxious, but they must trust the police to sort this matter out.
“We should not let this one incident destroy everything we have worked to build over all these years. Police have been in touch with all the religious communities and we are meeting to see how we can resolve this issue safely and without any more incidents.”
City mayor Sir Peter Soulsby said he had been in contact with the police and reiterated their call for calm.
“Something of this sort is worrying and distressing, but it’s important to make the point of how unusual it is for something like this to happen in Leicester,” he said.
“And a lot of people have been left scratching their heads, wondering how it ever happened in the first place.
“We have to make sure that this does not go any further and the police are allowed to do their job.”
Officers have been visiting places of worship, businesses and members of the community to reassure them the attack was an isolated incident.
Nosheen Awan, who runs designer clothing shop Rima’s, a few doors away from the Moghul Durbar restaurant, said: “There have been a lot of rumours going around. It’s hard to know what to believe.
“We haven’t been open long and it’s scary to know that something like this has happened.”
Anyone with information relating to the incident can call police on 101.
Alternatively, contact Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.
• Six men have been charged over the restaurant attack and are due to appear at Leicester Magistrates Court today (Friday, January 18)
So the police and media, who would NEVER lie to us say this attack was fueled by false rumours. Interesting because now they have arrested some Muslims over an alleged sex attack. False rumours eh?
Five men and a youth arrested in Leicester
over alleged sex assault of 16-year-old girl
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Police investigating the alleged sexual assault of a 16-year-old girl have arrested five men and a youth.
The investigation was launched after her family raised concerns about her welfare.
-
Specialist officers have been working with the victim and as a result of this work the investigation has moved forward into the arrest phase.
This morning, five men, aged 20, 22 25, 27 and 39, and a 15-year-old boy, were arrested from different addresses in Leicester.
All remain in police custody while inquiries continue.
Detective Chief Inspector Andy Sharp, who is leading the investigation, said: “We currently have five men and one youth in custody and we’re in the process of interviewing them.
“We continue to work very closely with the victim and her family. She is being supported through the whole process by specialist officers.
“These kinds of investigations are extremely complex and it’s important we are thorough with all our inquiries. Every piece of information or evidence needs to be looked at in detail and this means it could well be a lengthy investigation.
“Also, the victim and her welfare is a key priority for us. We will continue to work with her, at a pace she is comfortable with, in order to support her through this process.”
A police spokesperson said: “Local officers continue to link in with residents and community leaders, who are supportive of the police investigations.
“Officers also continue to provide the community with daily updates and reassurance around various rumours and speculation.”
Anyone with any information about the incident is asked to contact police on 101. Alternatively, contact Crimestoppers, which is anonymous, on 0800 555 111.
The fact is that multiculturalism has failed massively and is leading to mass bloodshed and violence on our streets and the powers that be think that they can take a bury your head in the sand approach and hope it will all be ok. We can assure you it wont be. Much much worse is still to come.
S
Posted by Britannia Radio at 21:25
I mentioned to you a while ago that you were not Prime Minister material. You have proven that statement correct many times but none more so, than your decision to indefinitely postpone your speech on Britain’s position in Europe.You became Prime Minister on the weakest of votes. You have reneged on your cast iron election guaranteed in-out EU Referendum. You waste untold billions of our money in the EU bottomless pit and upon un-deserving nations when your own country suffers appalling poverty.You traitorously allow foreign rule in our sovereign country when you swore lifetime allegiance to Britain and to faithfully serve the will and independence of the British people. You are well aware that repeated surveys now show over 90% of British people want out of the EU. Not a renegotiated deal, OUT.You eagerly implement every EU demand. You fawn over Angela Merkel. And you demonstrate complete lack of backbone on Britain’s behalf, for which you are in office. You are indeed spineless as the papers say.When will you rescind Edward Heath’s treasonous European Communities Act 1972 ? It is unlawful anyway so it never became legally binding. When will you stop throwing our money away and start using it for your own country ? And when will you stop pretending that Britain is part of the EU ? The British people reject the EU.But then, you never were intended to work for Britain were you ? Your job has been to destroy your own country.Just be aware that the seething British public are after you for your high treason.
rp
A Case for Treason
Add comment (0)
Welcome to A Case for Treason
We would like to share with you the unbelievable amount of evidence that is available that proves beyond all doubt that Treason was committed by the Heath Government in the beginning of the 1970’s and as a direct result of the treason committed we are now locked into an illegal treaty with the EU (then the EEC). and consequently - due to continued treasonous activities of present-day politicians in Parliament - this government is upholding all six illegal & treasonous EU treaties, which is wholly against the freedoms and rights granted to the people of the UK by the 'British Constitution'.
Albert explains
This is a genuine case and the implications for this case couldn’t be more important for the people of the United Kingdom as they are right now.
We have been networking with people all over Europe and it seems that treason has been committed not just here but pretty much every member state has been sabotaged from within. This is not a crusade against the people of Europe; this is a crusade against an evil empire growing within known as the EU that is attacking each member state from within their own Governments and agencies.
The signing of the Lisbon Treaty this has pretty much sealed our fate and this single document has handed this highly corrupt European Union the power to dissolve Parliament and effectively take us over. We also have evidence that implicates mainstream media networks such as the BBC and ITV that they are also involved but don’t take our word for it begin researching this immediately by looking at the evidence and video’s we present, use Google to see the scale of the problem, we are in the final years of this take over.
An overview on the whole case explained by Albert at the Lawful Rebellion Conference
This case is understood by a large group of MP's and MEP's and this battle is well underway. It's highly important that every British person know what is going on and even more importantly tell others.
|
Posted by Britannia Radio at 17:34
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)